Rand Paul Review

Rand Paul Review

Share this post

Rand Paul Review
Rand Paul Review
CAGE MATCH: Gender Theory VS Natural Law
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More

CAGE MATCH: Gender Theory VS Natural Law

Women's sports are for women, yes?

Rand Paul Review's avatar
Rand Paul Review
May 14, 2024
∙ Paid
233

Share this post

Rand Paul Review
Rand Paul Review
CAGE MATCH: Gender Theory VS Natural Law
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
67
36
Share

A woman is a “human female.” Please send this to leftists. They seem confused about the basic facts of life and biology.

Most if not all leftists act as if the Constitution has nothing to do with Christian values and ethics. How else could they conclude that the law should undergird gender or species confusion?

Rand Paul Review is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

Last month, the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled 8-6 that two cases denying state health insurance in gender-affirming cases are discriminatory, according to The Los Angeles Times.

The cases involve North Carolina’s state employee health plan and the coverage of gender-affirming surgery by West Virginia Medicaid.

Earlier in April, the 4th Circuit judges ruled that West Virginia’s ban on transgender sports violated the rights of a teen athlete under Title IX, a federal law that bars schools from sex-based discrimination.

In this latest…

Keep reading with a 7-day free trial

Subscribe to Rand Paul Review to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 Rand Paul Review
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share

Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More