"I supported the tax cuts in 2017. I support making them permanent, so I support that part of the bill. I support spending cuts. I think the cuts currently in the bill are wimpy and anemic, but I s…
"I supported the tax cuts in 2017. I support making them permanent, so I support that part of the bill. I support spending cuts. I think the cuts currently in the bill are wimpy and anemic, but I still would support the bill, even with wimpy and anemia cuts, if they weren't going to explode the debt. The problem is the math doesn't add up. They're going to explode the debt. The House's is $4 trillion. The Senate's actually been talking about exploding the debt by $5 trillion," Paul said.
Told you so. Sen. Paul is correct.
Speaker Johnson clashes with Rand Paul over 'wimpy' spending cuts in Trump's bill
https://www.foxnews.com/.../speaker-johnson-clashes-rand...
"I supported the tax cuts in 2017. I support making them permanent, so I support that part of the bill. I support spending cuts. I think the cuts currently in the bill are wimpy and anemic, but I still would support the bill, even with wimpy and anemia cuts, if they weren't going to explode the debt. The problem is the math doesn't add up. They're going to explode the debt. The House's is $4 trillion. The Senate's actually been talking about exploding the debt by $5 trillion," Paul said.