49 Comments

In my sixty plus years, I have called the FBI about actual federal crimes three times. All three times they basically said they didn't care. The home raids are not all that needs to end. The whole thing should go, right along with most of the rest of the government.

Expand full comment

Spot on!

Bring on DOGE!

Expand full comment

Musk and Ramaswarmy have the bloated agencies in their crosshairs.

Expand full comment

Criminals will be happy!

Expand full comment

Anarchist still dreaming! FBI solves thousands of crimes every year. —- As for the story, Misleading headline. Yea, I’m not sure about that. The piece talks about a family that wants to sue the FBI but for what? That a judge signed their warrant and agreed to the raid? Give me more details please. If you want to strengthen the standards for probable cause then go a head, but it seems like a dumb idea to end raids against suspected criminals.

Expand full comment

Humans are highly corruptible in mind, body, and spirit. Without personal consequences, there is no deterrence, nor motivation to change the wrong mindedness that leads to egregious behavior. It’s human nature that those in authority are prone to use that power to hide their misdeeds, enabling their feelings of self-omnipotence. When exposed, they claim society is being ungrateful for the service they’ve performed. When punished, they become enemies of society.

Perhaps the answer is a type of malpractice insurance for law enforcement officers and the communities that employ them. If a doctor makes a mistake, he doesn’t lose his license and go to prison. He doesn’t lose his house and personal belongings. The insurance company pays restitution to the injured party.

Government employees involved in law enforcement must be required to carry personal insurance policies. If they are frequent offenders with many claims against them, they become uninsurable, and thus unemployable. That’s one way to weed them out of government and law enforcement.

Expand full comment

Only if the insurance is purchased and paid for by the salaried personnel, and not a corporate expense. Otherwise just another taxpayer paid slush fund for incompetence . If it’s intentional, then insurance doesn’t pay and the individual pays and is fired

Expand full comment

Nah, insurance is one of the greatest lies ever told. PERSONAL consequences, not agency insurance. About the time asset forfeiture is real, the over reach stops immediately.

Expand full comment

A more relevant question is: Why are so many federal laws being written to directly target the citizens?

Expand full comment

FBI ≈ Police State

Expand full comment

Shut down the FBI. Wei don’t need a national police force. Rethink and redesign its useful priorities.

Expand full comment

Defunding accomplishes this...

Expand full comment

FBI Mission - interstate crimes , bank robbery, kidnapping,

Expand full comment

Fine. Create a new agency for those things without the baggage of the existing FBI.

Expand full comment

I think a better alternative would be a cleansing of the FBI and real leadership that respected the Constitution. Sadly the Biden gang looted the treasury to reward McCabe and others with fat settlements and full restoration of their retirement.

Hopefully someone on team trump is already working to identify those in the FBI who were working with Louie Freeh on the Burisma influence peddling assignment.

Expand full comment

Alternative - Treat it like a troubled company with incompetent and corrupt managers but an essential product. Get rid of the corruption and corrupt leadership. The rot is at the top

https://bidenlaptopemails.com/email.php?id=20160715-075407_102132

Expand full comment

Dream big for accountability and a MUCH smaller Government. I’m hoping it all starts on January 20th.

Expand full comment

You do not need hope, you need assurance. We have that.

Expand full comment

It's apparent , and confirmed by insiders, that the FBI is obtaining search warrants based on fabricated "evidence" and then conducting no knock, pre-dawn , raids on law abiding citizens. Grounds for the raids include speaking up at school board meeting, suspicion of being a law abiding citizen in possession of a firearm that MIGHT be illegal.

The killing of the Little Rock Airport Manager, a highly respected member of the community who was suspected of possessing illegal firearms components is a prime example. Prior to smashing the front door a dozen or so FBI agents disabled the security video system and also killed power to the house. The first thing the homeowner heard was the front door being smashed in .

Thinking it was a home invasion he grabbed a pistol to protect his wife and went towards the door in the darkness (FBI had killed the power) A handful of seconds later he lay dead on the floor having been shot multiple times by FBI agents.

This was not someone running a drug gang or terrorist organization.

There were multiple , very low risk options for conducting the search . However, the FBI chose to follow it's Shock and Awe tactics (specifically prohibited by the 4'th Amendment). Why - Remember the kids that loved to pull the wings off butterflies just to watch them suffer because it made them feel powerful.

This is the same FBI whose leadership worked with Hunter Biden's Burisma Influence Peddling operation (as documented in former FBI Director Louie Freeh in his emails to Hunter including this

https://bidenlaptopemails.com/email.php?id=20160715-075407_102132

Marco Polo searchable collection of 125,000 of Hunter Biden emails

https://bidenlaptopemails.com/index.php

Expand full comment

Basically they would only have logically planned it that way if they planned to murder him.

Expand full comment

It’s also to discourage any resistance or even questioning of what they are doing

SHOCK AND AWE in the proud tradition of Stalin and Mao

Expand full comment

Misleading headline. Yea, I’m not sure about that. The piece talks about a family that wants to sue the FBI but for what? That a judge signed their warrant and agreed to the raid? Give me more details please. If you want to strengthen the standards for probable cause then go a head, but it seems like a dumb idea to end raids against suspected criminals.

Expand full comment

The Little Rock case?

Expand full comment

All unconstitutional laws or regulations or court decisions, must be RESCINDED OR REPEALED by Act of Congress. Such a bill must bar of the passing of any new laws or regulations that violate the Constitution.

These laws and bureaucracies (and judges in some cases) are always implemented in the name of ‘our safety’ or some other fake protection:

The Patriot Act

Arrest without warrant

Invasion of property

Illegal searches of persons or property, or personal financial or medical or other records, including digital: TSA, HS, HHS, EPS, CDC, NIH, IRS and more.

Repeal the use of facial recognition software where no crime has been committed

Repeal all laws making US Government propaganda ‘legal’ in the USA

Repeal all ‘ BAIL-IN’ laws.

Repeal anything allowing the tracking of US Citizens.

Repeal all laws exempting members of Congress from compliance with laws (example insider trading).

Repeal all laws limiting US Citizens right to grow food or collect rainwater on their own property.

Repeal all authority to require or mandate any medical treatment or vaccination, for any person of any age...

There is much more. Many violations of our Constitution are embedded in ‘regulations’ issued by bureaucrats who are NOT LAWMAKERS. Perhaps we need to start over and consider throwing out all of these regulations that operate as laws in our lives, but were never passed or even read by any lawmakers, whether Federal or State or Local.

States and Local governments must be barred from enacting unconstitutional laws and regulations,as well.

I literally do not know what can be done about the lawless FBI, CIA, SS, and also various institutions in charge of health treatments, drugs, food, water, air...which seemingly operate to harm the citizens all under the guise of helping us.

God protect and Bless you Rand Paul.

Expand full comment

Rand Paul, I would love to see a restriction on our National Guard - they should never be sent overseas; that is why we have a standing military. And the military should only be sent on orders from Congress. NO MORE of this "peacekeeping", etc - and no more of these war mongering, neocon Presidents bypassing Congress!!!

Expand full comment

Hear hear!

Expand full comment

The consequences for an illegal raid at this incorrect door is a firefight, with many stormtroopers dead, before me.

Expand full comment

Rand Paul has lots of good intentions that never materialize!

Expand full comment

Because they are blocked by the Senators who are mostly a corrupt lot compromised by those who have bought them ... Thune and Corryn as examples, Murkowski top of the list ...

Expand full comment

When you vocalize you have the evidence. You have the proof. When you state you have lied to Congress etc etc… and still nothing moves forward to court, it all becomes hot air over & over again. Hot air is not what tax $$ should be paying for!

Expand full comment

The Senate and House consistently "block". If you need evidence for this, it is rather telling.

Expand full comment

Maybe because many are dumb ideas. Rand wouldn’t have been elected if it wasn’t for his dad’s name and the fact it was Kentucky in 2010 Tea Party wave. And then lucky to win a primary in 2016 when Trump wave was coming.

Misleading headline. Yea, I’m not sure about that. The piece talks about a family that wants to sue the FBI but for what? That a judge signed their warrant and agreed to the raid? Give me more details please. If you want to strengthen the standards for probable cause then go a head, but it seems like a dumb idea to end raids against suspected criminals.

Expand full comment

Maybe because many are dumb ideas. Rand would have won the primary in 2010 if it wasn’t for his dad’s name. And he won reelection in 2016 thanks Trump wave. Passed and done nothing of substance in all these years. His dad Ron used to be a fraudster. He stuff pork in bills for his district to get reelected , then vote against it in the floor to maintain a nice fake score.

As to the story, Misleading headline. Yea, I’m not sure about that. The piece talks about a family that wants to sue the FBI but for what? That a judge signed their warrant and agreed to the raid? Give me more details please. If you want to strengthen the standards for probable cause then go a head, but it seems like a dumb idea to end raids against suspected criminals.

Expand full comment

Senator Paul, the Federal Govt has no respect for the laws that govern our country nor do they respect laws that protect us from trespassing on our property. TRUMP has hinted at shutting down the FBI for mass corruption which will give us more freedom to protect our rights.

You have my vote 2028 🇱🇷

Expand full comment

Defund the FBI.

Expand full comment

Highly recommend Kyle Seraphin podcasts

Expand full comment

Absolutely untrustworthy and gone rogue

Expand full comment

How? Misleading headline. Yea, I’m not sure about that. The piece talks about a family that wants to sue the FBI but for what? That a judge signed their warrant and agreed to the raid? Give me more details please. If you want to strengthen the standards for probable cause then go a head, but it seems like a dumb idea to end raids against suspected criminals.

Expand full comment

Conservatives have a few homes to raid first!

Nancy Pelosi

Adam Schiff

Cuck Schumer (couldn't resist)

Hillary Clinton

All of Barack and Michael Obama's properties.

Expand full comment